Improving security and resolving the conflicts were priorities among displaced households, and to a lesser extent among others. The survey explored further if the respondents believed that peace was possible, and their opinion as to whatwas needed to end the violence and improve security. Respondents generally felt that violent conflict at some level was likely to persist in Mindanao. When asked whether they believed that all the religious groups, clans, and peoples of Mindanao could live together peacefully, without violence, 40 percent or more responded negatively thinking about the clans, and 29 percent believed religious groups could not live together peacefully.Negative views on peace were found throughout the survey area in mainland Mindanao in similar proportions, except in Maguindanao, where respondents were, on average, more optimistic about the prospect for peace compared to the rest of the population (94% believed all religious groups could live together). Views on peace did not vary significantly by settlement status.
Figure 39: Views on Peace
Notwithstanding these pessimistic views, a majority of respondents believed that parties to the conflict and other authorities were committed to end the violence, including the central government (80%) and provincial authorities (78%). Views on the central and provincial authorities were similar across strata. However, respondent views were more divided regarding the AFP, MILF, MNLF and clan leaders:
Table 8: Perception of commitment to end violence in Mindanao?
In North Cotabato, Maguindanao, and Lanao del Norte the struggles for self-determinationwere identified as the main cause of the violence in Mindanao since 2000 (76%, 70%, and 57% of respondents, respectively). In Lanao del Sur and Sultan Kudarat, it was mentioned by 27 percent and 41 percent of people. The root cause was most frequently identified as clans fighting for power in Lanao del Sur and Sultan Kudarat (59% and 51% respectively), whereas in North Cotabato, Maguindanao and Lanao del Norte, clan struggles were identified by 19 percent, 24 percent and 27 percent, respectively. Other root causes identified by respondents included fights over land (8% in Lanao del Sur, and 7% in Sultan Kudarat).
In the light of these root causes identified by the respondents, the survey explored perspectives on what needed to be done to end the violence. Most frequently, their answers focused on economic development (64%), signing of the peace agreement (48%), ending impunity (43%), and ending land disputes (31%). Signing the peace agreement was proposed by about everyone (93%) in Maguindanao, where self-determination was identified as the main root cause of violence. In that province, 17 percentalso wanted AFP removed from the area. Respondents further proposed having a dialogue between armed groups (53%), between clans (38%) and between religious groups (37%), as well as training the police (17%) as the best means to improve security.
Figure 40: Proposed means to end the violence
Figure 41: Proposed means to improve security
While the respondents identified the struggle for power and self-determination as the roots of the conflicts in Mindanao, conflicts have also been shaped by religious identity.[1] Compared to respondents with a Christian religious belief, Muslim respondents were:
These results highlight some key differences in perception of security and political actors, as well as a lack of trust between groups. This in turn may affect how respondents believed peace can be achieved. While 59 percent of the Muslim respondents believed that signing a peace agreement would end the violence, just 36 percent of the Christian respondents believed so, likely reflecting their lack of trust in the MILF and MNLF. Rather, Christian respondents emphasized the need to improve the economic situation (74% vs. 56% amongst Muslims), end impunity (45% vs. 40%), and resolve land conflicts (35% vs. 28%).
[1]Schiavo-Campo S, Judd M, The Mindanao Conflict in the Philippines: Roots, Costs, and Potential Peace Dividend, Social Development Papers, Conflict Prevention & Reconstruction Paper No. 24/ February 2005